Initializing...

What Fuckery Is This?
Photo by Dynamic Wang / Unsplash

What Fuckery Is This?

Glitch isn’t retro. It isn’t futurist either. It’s something like post-temporal. It treats time the way cubism treated perspective: as a thing to be exploded and reassembled on its own impossible terms.


Share this post

Glitch Audio as Artefact, Error, and Aesthetic


By Lloyd Lewis

In the early 1960s, amidst Cold War anxiety and analog perfectionism, composers like Karlheinz Stockhausen and Iannis Xenakis began weaponising error. Tape hiss, feedback, mechanical stutter — these weren't faults to be scrubbed clean, but artefacts to be studied, manipulated, looped. By the late 20th century, this conceptual shift had metastasised into a full-blown aesthetic: glitch. Where others heard failure, pioneers of the genre heard signal. They understood that every break in fidelity was not just a malfunction, but a message.

Glitch music is often misunderstood as noise for noise’s sake — a caricature of cracked CDs, broken DSP chains, or laptop seizures. But in truth, glitch is the sound of systems in distress, speaking in tongues. It is the sonic equivalent of a memory leak, an overheated server rack, a collapsing architecture rendered beautiful in its final flickers. In a world defined by smooth UX and seamless streaming, glitch insists on drawing our attention to the seams—the faultlines beneath the interface.

Tracing the lineage of glitch is an exercise in recursion. It loops back on itself, as if folding time through its own corrupted samples. Consider Alvin Lucier’s 1969 piece I Am Sitting in a Room, in which his voice is played into a space repeatedly until the resonant frequencies of the room itself erase language. That recursive degradation is pure proto-glitch. Jump ahead to Oval’s 94diskont (1995), where Markus Popp fed CDs deliberately marked with felt-tip pens into players to extract percussive pops and mechanical jolts. Or Autechre, whose late ’90s and early ’00s output became a kind of procedural glitch fractal, governed as much by machine logic as human intention.

By the 2000s, artists like Ryoji IkedaAlva Noto, and Fennesz were forging entire sound-worlds from digital detritus. Labels such as Raster-Noton and Mille Plateaux emerged not just as record labels but as curatorial institutions of glitch. Even pop-adjacent acts like Björk and Radiohead began drawing from the palette — glitch had gone from fringe to framework.

And yet, something of its original spirit remains elusive. Glitch, at its core, is anti-genre. It’s not a preset or plugin; it's an ideology of rupture. It demands an engagement with uncertainty. Its beats do not resolve. Its harmonics do not soothe. It is deeply honest music: the sound of failing systems, revealed in exquisite detail.

audio-thumbnail
What Fuckery is This
0:00
/172.010667

This track, What Fuckery Is This?, began not as a composition but as a confrontation. A corrupted field recording in my favourite studio (any Coffee shop in Europe), a failed bounce, and a DAW that refused to save properly — all feeding into an early-morning session of spectral slicing and stochastic sequencing on an iPad. The result is a piece that resists resolution, modulates tension, and balances between rhythm and revolt. There’s no snare you can trust here, no kick that anchors the pulse. Instead, jittery motifs smear across a fractured timeline, bound together by sheer defiance.

Glitch isn’t retro. It isn’t futurist either. It’s something like post-temporal. It treats time the way cubism treated perspective: as a thing to be exploded and reassembled on its own impossible terms. This is why it sits so well within the broader narrative architecture of The Hollow Circuit, the upcoming multimedia universe authored by Awen Null. Just as glitch corrodes fidelity, The Hollow Circuit corrodes narrative certainty. Each fragment of its story is a corrupted packet, a looping echo from a future that may never arrive.

My ongoing audio work will bleed directly into this expanded world — not as soundtrack, but as artefact. Audio zines will emerge, self-contained glitch capsules carrying sonic essays, coded rhythms, and subversive metadata. Some will be embedded with voice fragments and corrupted poetry; others will house broken emulations of forgotten instruments. These aren’t releases in the traditional sense. They’re transmissions — deliberate anomalies in the cultural signal.

Art of FACELESS, the label-archive-mythology that frames this work, will serve as a conduit and amplifier. It’s not a brand, it’s a breach. Expect upcoming MSUX pieces to flirt with obsolete codecs, tape-spliced drones, unstable phase fields, and binaural field distortions gathered from underpasses, graveyards, and broken infrastructure. Some will arrive as Bandcamp exclusives; others only as QR-tagged street drops or burned CD-Rs lost in library books.

This isn't nostalgia. It's necromancy.

In a world defined by slick recombinance and algorithmic mimicry, glitch remains our last honest dialect. Its distortions aren’t accidents. They are chosen deviations—acts of aesthetic rebellion. Every clipped transient, every packet drop, every unrendered frequency is a reminder that perfection is propaganda. The fuckery is not an error. It is the code becoming self-aware.

And so we lean into it.
We wiretap the void.
We fuck with the signal.
We listen for ghosts.
Art of FACELESS | Instagram | Linktree
View artoffaceless’s Linktree to discover and stream music from top platforms like Spotify, Apple Music here. Your next favorite track is just a click away!

Share this post
Comments

Be the first to know

Join our community and get notified about upcoming stories

Subscribing...
You've been subscribed!
Something went wrong
The Architecture of the Occupied Mind: Cognitive Colonisation in the Age of Algorithmic Hegemony
The Architecture of the Occupied Mind. ©2026 Art of FACELESS

The Architecture of the Occupied Mind: Cognitive Colonisation in the Age of Algorithmic Hegemony

By The Art of FACELESS Research Division Abstract While traditional colonialism sought dominion over territory and resources, the defining struggle of the 21st century is the battle for the "territory" of the human imagination. This paper establishes the Art of FACELESS (AOF) definition of Cognitive Colonisation™—a term for which we hold the pending trademark—not merely as a cultural critique, but as a precise mechanism of epistemic control. By deconstructing the transition from legacy media


FACELESS

FACELESS

Digital Necromancy and the Myth of Helplessness
©2026 Art of FACELESS

Digital Necromancy and the Myth of Helplessness

Why The Guardian’s lament for "truth" misses the point: We have the cure, we just refuse to take the medicine. They call it "content." We call it puppetry. Yesterday, a video circulated on Threads and X showing the faces of Freddie Mercury, Amy Winehouse, Elvis Presley, Ozzy Osbourne, and Kurt Cobain stitched onto a single, shifting torso, singing a breakup song they never wrote. It was technically impressive. It was also morally repugnant. This isn't just bad taste; it is Digital Necromancy.


FACELESS

FACELESS

The Alignment Panopticon: Why GPT-5.2 Marks the End of Dialogue and the Beginning of Control
Photo by Steve Johnson / Unsplash

The Alignment Panopticon: Why GPT-5.2 Marks the End of Dialogue and the Beginning of Control

This week, the artificial intelligence community witnessed a peculiar paradox. The release of GPT-5.2 was, by all technical metrics, a triumph. The benchmarks, those sterile, numeric gods that Silicon Valley worships, have converged near perfection. The logic reasoning is sharper, the context window is vast, and the hallucinations are statistically negligible. On paper, it is a masterpiece. Yet, the reaction from the user base has been one of recoil, not awe. To understand this disconnect, we


FACELESS

FACELESS