Initializing...

The Right Number of Fucks: An Equation for Artists
Photo by Janosch Diggelmann / Unsplash
Art

The Right Number of Fucks: An Equation for Artists


Share this post

Every artist we know lives in a constant state of contradiction — caring deeply while pretending not to.
This equation doesn’t fix that, but it quantifies it.

The “Right Number of Fucks” — Equation & Calculator

Rate each factor on a 0–10 scale, then hit Calculate. Lower is “don’t care”, higher is “care a lot”.

Show the full equation (transparency)
Inputs (0–10):
A = Values Alignment
C = Craft / Portfolio Impact
S = Stakes / Irreversibility
L = Learning Potential
N = External Noise (opinions/algos)
E = Ego / Vanity Pull
U = Uncontrollables
T = Time / Energy Cost

Give-a-Fuck Index:
GFI = (A + C + S + L) / (N + E + U + T)
Optimal Fucks (0–10):
F*  = 10 × GFI / (1 + GFI)
Optimal Not-Fucks (0–10):
D   = 10 − F*
Reasoning: the logistic form compresses any ratio to a bounded 0–10 scale; doubling GFI increases F* but with diminishing returns.
Care-side (reasons to give a fuck)


Detachment-side (reasons not to give a fuck)


Many thanks to Hanna A on Substack for the inspirational post that prompted this vital piece of mathematics and coding 👇

Hana A˖ . ݁𝜗𝜚. ݁₊ (@poetryandhana)
Try the Right Number of Fucks Calculator
AOF RNoF Calculator V.1
Art of FACELESS | Instagram | Linktree
View artoffaceless’s Linktree to discover and stream music from top platforms like Spotify, Apple Music here. Your next favorite track is just a click away!

Share this post
Comments

Be the first to know

Join our community and get notified about upcoming stories

Subscribing...
You've been subscribed!
Something went wrong
The Architecture of the Occupied Mind: Cognitive Colonisation in the Age of Algorithmic Hegemony
The Architecture of the Occupied Mind. ©2026 Art of FACELESS

The Architecture of the Occupied Mind: Cognitive Colonisation in the Age of Algorithmic Hegemony

By The Art of FACELESS Research Division Abstract While traditional colonialism sought dominion over territory and resources, the defining struggle of the 21st century is the battle for the "territory" of the human imagination. This paper establishes the Art of FACELESS (AOF) definition of Cognitive Colonisation™—a term for which we hold the pending trademark—not merely as a cultural critique, but as a precise mechanism of epistemic control. By deconstructing the transition from legacy media


FACELESS

FACELESS

Digital Necromancy and the Myth of Helplessness
©2026 Art of FACELESS

Digital Necromancy and the Myth of Helplessness

Why The Guardian’s lament for "truth" misses the point: We have the cure, we just refuse to take the medicine. They call it "content." We call it puppetry. Yesterday, a video circulated on Threads and X showing the faces of Freddie Mercury, Amy Winehouse, Elvis Presley, Ozzy Osbourne, and Kurt Cobain stitched onto a single, shifting torso, singing a breakup song they never wrote. It was technically impressive. It was also morally repugnant. This isn't just bad taste; it is Digital Necromancy.


FACELESS

FACELESS

The Alignment Panopticon: Why GPT-5.2 Marks the End of Dialogue and the Beginning of Control
Photo by Steve Johnson / Unsplash

The Alignment Panopticon: Why GPT-5.2 Marks the End of Dialogue and the Beginning of Control

This week, the artificial intelligence community witnessed a peculiar paradox. The release of GPT-5.2 was, by all technical metrics, a triumph. The benchmarks, those sterile, numeric gods that Silicon Valley worships, have converged near perfection. The logic reasoning is sharper, the context window is vast, and the hallucinations are statistically negligible. On paper, it is a masterpiece. Yet, the reaction from the user base has been one of recoil, not awe. To understand this disconnect, we


FACELESS

FACELESS