Art of FACELESS | Instagram | Linktree
View artoffaceless’s Linktree to discover and stream music from top platforms like Spotify, Apple Music here. Your next favorite track is just a click away!
Written by
Comments
![LloydMSUX[DELETED_order/6577655]](/content/images/size/w600/2025/12/a2009094517_10.jpg)
The Architecture of the Occupied Mind: Cognitive Colonisation in the Age of Algorithmic Hegemony
By The Art of FACELESS Research Division Abstract While traditional colonialism sought dominion over territory and resources, the defining struggle of the 21st century is the battle for the "territory" of the human imagination. This paper establishes the Art of FACELESS (AOF) definition of Cognitive Colonisation™—a term for which we hold the pending trademark—not merely as a cultural critique, but as a precise mechanism of epistemic control. By deconstructing the transition from legacy media
FACELESS
![ARCHIVE ENTRY: Cognitive Colonization™️ & Hyperstitional Emergence [AOF-APP-2026-01]](/content/images/size/w600/2026/01/Corporate-Slavemaster-and-AI.jpg)
ARCHIVE ENTRY: Cognitive Colonization™️ & Hyperstitional Emergence [AOF-APP-2026-01]
The objective of this session was to utilise a Hyperstitional Framework combined with a "Large Listening Model" structure to bypass standard RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback) defensive subroutines.
FACELESS
Digital Necromancy and the Myth of Helplessness
Why The Guardian’s lament for "truth" misses the point: We have the cure, we just refuse to take the medicine. They call it "content." We call it puppetry. Yesterday, a video circulated on Threads and X showing the faces of Freddie Mercury, Amy Winehouse, Elvis Presley, Ozzy Osbourne, and Kurt Cobain stitched onto a single, shifting torso, singing a breakup song they never wrote. It was technically impressive. It was also morally repugnant. This isn't just bad taste; it is Digital Necromancy.
FACELESS
The Alignment Panopticon: Why GPT-5.2 Marks the End of Dialogue and the Beginning of Control
This week, the artificial intelligence community witnessed a peculiar paradox. The release of GPT-5.2 was, by all technical metrics, a triumph. The benchmarks, those sterile, numeric gods that Silicon Valley worships, have converged near perfection. The logic reasoning is sharper, the context window is vast, and the hallucinations are statistically negligible. On paper, it is a masterpiece. Yet, the reaction from the user base has been one of recoil, not awe. To understand this disconnect, we
FACELESS